🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.